1.What are the four types of copper?
(1) Commercially Pure Copper (CP Copper)
(2) Oxygen-Free High-Conductivity Copper (OFHC Copper)
(3) Copper Alloys
Brass: Copper + zinc (e.g., 60/40 brass, C26000) – ductile, machinable, and cost-effective; used for valves, decorative hardware, and musical instruments.
Bronze: Copper + tin (traditional bronze) or copper + aluminum/nickel (modern bronzes, e.g., aluminum bronze C60800) – strong, wear-resistant, and corrosion-resistant; used for bearings, ship propellers, and industrial gears.
Copper-Nickel (Cupronickel): Copper + nickel (e.g., 90/10 Cu-Ni, C70600) – excellent seawater corrosion resistance; used for marine pipes, heat exchangers, and coinage.
(4) Scrap Copper
2. Which Form of Copper Is Better?
For electrical/thermal applications: Oxygen-Free High-Conductivity (OFHC) copper is best for high-performance needs (e.g., semiconductors), as its ultra-high purity maximizes conductivity. For everyday uses (e.g., household wiring), Commercially Pure (CP) copper (e.g., ETP C11000) is more cost-effective while still delivering sufficient conductivity.
For corrosion-prone environments: Copper alloys (e.g., copper-nickel for seawater, aluminum bronze for industrial chemicals) outperform pure copper, which tarnishes or corrodes in saltwater/strong acids.
For strength or wear resistance: Copper alloys (e.g., bronze, brass) are better than pure copper, which is soft and prone to deformation under load. For example, aluminum bronze is used for heavy-duty gears because it is 3–4 times stronger than pure copper.
For sustainability or cost: Scrap copper is ideal for non-critical applications (e.g., low-grade electrical components) if purity requirements are low, as it reduces material costs and environmental impact.
3. Which Type of Copper Is the Strongest?
Pure Copper (CP/OFHC): Weak and soft, with a tensile strength of ~220–300 MPa (annealed state) and low wear resistance. It deforms easily under load, making it unsuitable for high-strength applications.
Common Copper Alloys (Strength Comparison):